California's lawsuit against Exxon for misleading recycling claims could result in significant damages

From Investing.com.: 2024-09-25 10:31:25

California’s lawsuit against Exxon for fueling plastic pollution through deceptive recycling practices is based on a public nuisance claim. This legal theory seeks to make the responsible party pay to fix the issue, as seen in recent successful cases against opioid manufacturers. Exxon denies the allegations, opening up a complex legal battle.

The lawsuit expands beyond direct pollution claims by targeting Exxon’s misleading recycling information, leading to widespread plastic waste. While Exxon disputes the allegations, California is seeking to hold them accountable for abating the pollution. Similar lawsuits have been filed against other companies like PepsiCo for their contribution to plastic pollution.

If the court rejects the public nuisance theory, California’s lawsuit against Exxon can still proceed based on unfair business practices, false advertising, and environmental pollution laws. Even without a public nuisance claim, the lawsuit has the potential to result in significant damages if successful.



Read more at Investing.com.: Explainer-California says Exxon’s recycling claims created a ‘public nuisance.’ What does that mean? By Reuters