The iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) outperformed abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) in one-year return and drawdown metrics. SLVP invests in miners while PPLT tracks platinum prices. PPLT has a higher expense ratio and larger assets under management. Both offer exposure to precious metals but with different risk profiles.

SLVP charges a lower annual fee of 0.39% compared to PPLT’s 0.60%, yet PPLT manages $2.86 billion in assets versus SLVP’s $950.3 million. SLVP has a higher one-year return of 206.1% and a deeper drawdown than PPLT. Beta and AUM also differ between the two ETFs.

PPLT closely mirrors platinum prices, managing over $2 billion in assets and aims for direct exposure to platinum performance. SLVP invests in a global basket of mining companies, introducing company and operational risks. Both ETFs have surged due to rising precious metals prices amid inflation concerns.

Investors seeking inflation protection or portfolio diversification through precious metals can choose between PPLT for direct exposure to platinum prices or SLVP for exposure to mining companies. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results, so consider the risks associated with each ETF before investing.

For more information on ETF investing, visit the full guide at the provided link. The comparison between SLVP and PPLT highlights the differences in structure, volatility, and recent performance of these two metals ETFs, helping investors make informed decisions based on their objectives and risk tolerance.

Read more at Yahoo Finance: 2 Ways to Play the Surging Precious Metals Rally: SLVP and PPLT