VT has a lower expense ratio but lower dividend yield compared to ACWX. ACWX outperformed VT in the past year. ACWX holds only non-U.S. stocks, while VT combines U.S. and international equities. Both ETFs aim to provide broad international equity exposure.

ACWX has higher fees but a higher dividend yield than VT, making it more attractive to investors seeking higher income. VT has a lower expense ratio, making it more affordable for long-term holders. ACWX has a higher one-year return compared to VT.

ACWX tracks non-U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks, while VT combines U.S. and international stocks. VT has substantially outperformed ACWX in the long term, yielding nearly 150% more since 2008. ACWX has a true broad international focus in its top 10 holdings.

Investors should be aware that international stocks in both ETFs can exhibit volatility different from U.S. stocks. ACWX’s top 10 holdings are more internationally focused compared to VT. U.S. investors should monitor relevant events in foreign countries associated with each ETF.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide. The Motley Fool has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends certain options and has a disclosure policy. “ACWX vs. VT: Comparing Two of the Top Global ETFs” was originally published by The Motley Fool.

Read more at Yahoo Finance: Comparing Two of the Top Global ETFs