President Trump has proposed moving to semiannual reporting instead of quarterly earnings. Critics argue it undermines transparency, while others see it as an opportunity to focus on the long term. CEOs debate the pros and cons, with some advocating for more investor engagement and less obsession with quarterly numbers.

Adjusted earnings numbers have become a point of contention, with analysts and investors questioning their usefulness. Companies often provide adjusted figures to downplay recurring expenses, leading to confusion and skepticism among stakeholders. Some argue that companies should be judged by their bottom-line numbers, not adjusted figures that may skew financial performance.

There is a call for more transparency and investor engagement in earnings calls. Retail investors are seeking a more active role, like Elon Musk’s inclusion of retail investor questions at Tesla’s calls. With the rise of retail investors, executives must recognize their influence and provide a platform for their questions on earnings calls.

Another issue in corporate governance is the longevity of board members. Rotating board members every five to seven years is suggested to bring in fresh ideas and prevent detachment among long-tenured members. This could also help deter activist investors who target established boards. The goal is to keep boards agile and responsive to industry changes.

Brian Sozzi, Yahoo Finance’s Executive Editor, raises important points about quarterly earnings and corporate governance. From the debate over adjusted earnings to the need for more retail investor participation in calls, these issues shape how companies engage with stakeholders and drive long-term value. The push for transparency and accountability in corporate reporting continues to evolve.

Read more at Yahoo Finance: Trump’s desire to end quarterly earnings should include these 3 things too